International experts and scholars on women’s rights, LGBTIQ rights and international criminal law came together to discuss the new crimes against humanity convention. Participants examined the legal theories and current debates regarding criminalization of persecution on the grounds of gender discrimination contained within the new crimes against humanity draft treaty provisions, and they developed recommendations on effective strategies for infusing a gender analysis during the International Law Commission’s final stages of the treaty drafting process. See the Outcomes Report for a full summary. The meeting was held at CUNY Law School and supported by UNWOMEN.
Members of the International Law Commission (ILC) attended a reception to discuss the draft crimes against humanity treaty and proposed recommendations regarding gender-related provisions in the draft treaty. The current Chairman of the ILC, Eduardo Valencia-Ospina, provided opening remarks. Sean Murphy, the Special Rapporteur on crimes against humanity for the ILC, Patricia Viseur-Sellers, Special Advisor on Gender to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Lisa Davis, Associate Professor of Law at CUNY Law School and Senior Legal Advisor to MADRE, and Valerie Oosterveld, an international criminal law professor, spoke at the event.
Over the last two decades, international human rights law and jurisprudence have adopted language that accounts for the social construction of gender. Since its formation nearly twenty years ago, its understanding of gender-based persecution has never been tested, largely due to its opaque definition in the Rome Statute. What we do now will affect minority rights for generations to come.
International criminal law and women’s rights experts gathered to discuss the gender provisions of the draft crimes against humanity treaty. Experts discussed recommendations proposed at the March meeting as well as the need to mobilize broader civil society support for the initiative. The meeting was held at the London School of Economics.
The LGBTI Core Group, an informal cross-group of the UN member states who have expressed their commitment to LGBTIQ rights and are working for LGBTIQ-related interests at the UN-level in New York convened for their second annual retreat. The Core Group discussed the work on the treaty language thus far and emphasized the need for coordination of the UN General Assembly 6th Committee Coordination once the draft passes from the ILC to the Committee. The group is co-chaired by Argentina and the Netherlands, and includes Albania, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Croatia, Ecuador, El Salvador, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Montenegro, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Spain, the UK, the US, Uruguay, and the EU, as well as the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), and NGO representation from OutRight Action International and Human Rights Watch.
Participants gathered to attend Leiden University Law School’s summer session on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity in International Law: Human Rights and Beyond and engaged in a workshop session on the draft crimes against humanity treaty. Lisa Davis, and Jessica Stern, executive director of OutRight, engaged participants in an analysis of the threats, opportunities, strengths and weaknesses of the draft treaty’s gender provisions and provided feedback on recommendations discussed at previous experts’ workshops.
Over twenty-member state representatives working in the UN General Assembly’s 6th Committee gathered to discuss the proposed gender-related provisions under the draft crimes against humanity treaty. Representatives also discussed how states may make their own commentaries on these provisions to the ILC. Rene Urueña, Associate Professor and Director of Research at the Universidad Los Andes School of Law, Patricia Viseur-Sellers, Special Advisor on Gender to the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Lisa Davis, Associate Professor of Law at CUNY Law School and Senior Legal Advisor to MADRE, and Jessica Stern, Executive Director of OutRight spoke at the event.
MADRE co-hosted a briefing with LGBTIQ and women’s rights activists, along with international human rights and criminal law experts in Bogotá, Colombia to discuss the gender-related provisions under the proposed crimes against humanity treaty. The meeting was held at the Center for Socio-Legal Research, at the Universidad de Los Andes School of Law.
MADRE co-hosted an experts meeting bringing together 29 LGBTIQ rights experts and allies to discuss gender and LGBTIQ rights in the proposed crimes against humanity treaty. Participants discussed the gender-related provisions in the draft treaty and how they can be strengthened to support the LGBTIQ community. Participants also discussed current challenges the LGBTIQ community faces regarding access to justice and reparations for persecution based on sexual orientation, gender identity and sex characteristics, and the implications of the gender provisions in the treaty. See the Outcomes Report for a full summary. The meeting was held at CUNY Law School.
MADRE co-hosted a Strategies for Change Workshop. Participants discussed strategies for calling attention to the lack of accountability and redress for gender-based crimes committed by ISIS and the potential impact of the new crimes against humanity treaty.
MADRE, OutRight Action International, The Human Rights and Gender Justice (HRGJ) Clinic of CUNY School of Law, and the Center for Socio-Legal Research at the Universidad de Los Andes circulated a sign-on letter asking other organizations to join our call on the ILC to update the definition of gender in the draft treaty. The letter was translated into five languages (English, Spanish, French, Arabic and Chinese) and received nearly 600 organizational and academic sign-ons representing over 100 countries. HRGJ Clinic of CUNY Law School also drafted a legal submission calling for the definition of gender in the treaty to either be removed or revised and also calling for expanding the categories under persecution.
Eighteen governments also made submissions to the ILC calling for the deletion or revision of the definition of gender. Additionally, several UN Special Rapporteurs and other experts joined to draft two submissions to the ILC: The first submission calls on the Commission to update the definition of gender; The second submission calls on the Commission to expand the grounds for persecution in the draft treaty to include: disability, Indigenous status, age, social origin, language, and migrant and refugee status. In addition to MADRE's open letter, there were at least nine other civil society submissions commenting on gender-related provisions in the draft treaty, including comments made by twelve trans groups and networks around the word, a submission by Human Rights Watch, a letter signed by about 70 human rights organizations in Africa, and joint comments by intersex groups. For example, civil society submissions called on the ILC to update treaty language concerning enslavement, reproductive rights, torture, intersex rights, and enforced disappearances.