Sexual Rights are Human Rights
Posted on: Wednesday, September 6, 2006
A MADRE Position Paper
MADRE understands that sexual rights—including the right to exercise and express sexuality freely and safely; be protected from sexual violence and discrimination; be in charge of decisions about one’s own body; have access to information and services necessary for sexual health; and experience sexual pleasure—are human rights. Sexuality is essential to identity, social and personal interaction, and physical and mental health. And sexual rights are inextricably connected to economic, social and political rights: when one is violated, the others are affected.
Sexual rights have a firm basis in international law. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, and the Convention on the Rights of the Child implicitly protect sexual rights by guaranteeing rights to personal freedom, health, non-discrimination, equal opportunity, and protection from violence. Though intense opposition from several countries—including the US—has thwarted passage of a resolution directly addressing sexual rights, these rights are nonetheless becoming an increasingly accepted component of human rights in the international arena.
The Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in particular has spoken extensively about sexual rights as they relate to economic, social and cultural rights. In its General Comment No. 14, the Committee confirmed that the rights to sexual health, sexual freedom, and sexual education are protected by Article 12 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The Committee also specified that, as it threatens health, discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation is a violation of rights. In 1994, the UN Human Rights Committee ruled that the International Covenant on Political and Civil Rights also prohibits discrimination based on sexual orientation (Toonen vs. Australia). Other sexual rights, including women’s right to control the terms on which they engage in sex and be protected from sexual violence and discrimination have been even more explicitly documented in instruments such as The Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and the Declaration on the Elimination of Violence Against Women. In 2004, the UN Special Rapporteur on the Right to Health reflected a growing international consensus on sexual rights when he wrote, “the correct understanding of fundamental human rights principles, as well as existing human rights norms, leads ineluctably to the recognition of sexual rights as human rights” (E/CN.4.2004/49 paragraph 54).
Unfortunately, governments throughout the world are failing in their responsibility to protect sexual rights. Publicly, issues of sexuality are cloaked in a framework of denial, shame, and disapproval. Consequently:
- It is difficult for people to access accurate information about sexual health, including life-saving information about sexually transmitted infections, including HIV/AIDS;
- People often hesitate to report and seek justice in cases of sexual violence;
- Discrimination based on sexual preference and gender identity is rampant;
- Violations of sexual rights are officially condoned or encouraged.
The sexual rights of women, young people, gays, lesbians, bisexuals, and transgendered people are especially vulnerable—and, as emphasized by the recent murder of Sierra Leone’s lesbian rights activist Fannyann Eddy, those working actively to secure sexual rights are particularly at risk.
In many cases, the world’s most powerful political, economic, and military institutions violate sexual rights not only through oversight but also deliberately. In November 2004, 11 US states banned same-sex marriage and eight of these also banned any similar legal recognition or benefits for same-sex unions. In over 80 countries, governments have declared consensual sex between same-sex couples illegal; restrictions on consensual premarital or extramarital sex between heterosexual couples are also increasingly strict. In the global South, the International Monetary Fund’s demands for privatization and deregulation of health care are violating sexual rights by converting essential health services into market commodities.
Around the world, armies use sexual violence as a tool for the torture, humiliation, and control of civilian populations. The power of mass rape to both brutalize individuals and attack the social fabric of a community makes it an especially destructive weapon of war. Coupled with forced pregnancy,1 rape is used as a strategy to eradicate entire populations. Following revelations of mass rape in the Former Yugoslavia and the use of rape as a weapon of war in the Haitian coup d’etat in the early 1990s, women’s organizations, including MADRE, came together to press the Organization of American States and the United Nations to recognize rape not as a “private” crime against honor or decency, but a form of torture and a war crime. As Linda Burnham, Executive Director of the Women of Color Resource Center, recently pointed out, the US Army’s policy of stripping Iraqi inmates naked and forcing them into sexual poses demonstrated once again the complex relationships linking military power, sexual domination, machismo, sexism, racism, and homophobia. But the silence, shame, and ignorance that continue to surround sexual violence make sexual war crimes some of the hardest to prosecute, as evidenced by the track record of the International Criminal Tribunal on Rwanda.
The current growth of religious fundamentalisms, through which misogynist interpretations of religious texts are used to advance reactionary political agendas, present a major threat to sexual rights. The United States, driven by the Bush Administration’s Christian fundamentalist ideology, has led a global campaign to limit the transmission of essential information and services related to sex and sexuality. Bush has declared his support for a constitutional amendment to legalize discrimination against gays and lesbians and has made clear his intent to appoint anti-abortion judges to the Supreme Court. Internationally the Bush Administration has undermined international laws to protect sexual rights, for example by pushing ideologically-motivated abstinence programs in response to the AIDS pandemic, instead of the proven “safe sex” approach. In Africa, the Middle East, and Asia, fundamentalist Muslim governments are promoting interpretations of Sharia law, 2 under which people are sentenced to death for such crimes as having consensual sex with people of the same gender or outside of marriage.
When sexual rights are on the agenda, fundamentalist governments ally with the Vatican and the Christian Right, which suddenly assert “respect for cultural difference” as a pretense for disregarding international human rights standards. Human rights, however, are neither a Western nor a culturally relative concept, as groups like Women Living Under Muslim Law make clear. Moreover, the idea that any culture has one homogeneous set of values or traditions is false. MADRE recognizes that all people are entitled to the protection of international law whether they are confronting Muslim clerics in Iran or born-again Christian presidents in the United States.
1“Forced pregnancy occurs when abortion following rape is legally denied, practically obstructed or unacceptable to women themselves on religious or cultural grounds.” (“Advancing Reproductive Rights Beyond Cairo and Beijing,” Rebecca J. Cook and Mahoud F. Fathalla). During times of war, forced pregnancy is used to weaken and punish a specific group by forcing women to give birth to their oppressor’s children.
2Sharia law is a religious code based on the Koran. Many Muslims understand it as a personal, moral guide (much the same way that many Christians understand the Ten Commandments). But in some countries, Sharia law has been used as the basis for a state legal system.
Archives"Press Room" Home August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 July 2006 June 2006 April 2006 March 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 April 2005 March 2005 November 2004 October 2004 April 2004 March 2004 January 2004 December 2003 October 2003 September 2003 June 2003 April 2003 January 2003 September 2002 June 2002 January 2002 November 2001 October 2001 September 2001 August 2001 January 2001
MADRE & Our Partners Make News
In Iraq, women 'are the battlefield' (Women Under Siege , August 12, 2014)
Haitian woman faces death threats for speaking out about violence against women (WBEZ Worldview, July 16, 2014)
Media Spotlight Turns Away from Iraq, as Concerns Mount Over Human Rights and Political Stalemate (Uprising Radio, July 11, 2014)
Iraq: The women left behind (Aljazeera, July 3, 2014)
Under Isis, Iraqi women again face an old nightmare: violence and repression (The Guardian, July 3, 2014)