FREE SOCIETIES DO NOT INTIMIDATE BY CRUELTY AND CONQUEST
Posted on: Sunday, September 1, 2002
Keywords: US Foreign Policy
“FREE SOCIETIES DO NOT INTIMIDATE BY CRUELTY AND CONQUEST”
AND OTHER GREAT QUOTES FROM BUSH’S BIG SPEECH TO THE UN
By Yifat Susskind, Associate Director
1. “Our principles and our security are challenged today by outlaw groups and regimes that accept no law of morality and have no limit to their violent ambitions.”
• Conservative commentator Samuel Huntington has pointed out that many people worldwide consider the US to be “the single greatest external threat to their societies” (Foreign Affairs, 1999).
• Under Bush, the US stands in violation of international law for its bombing of Afghanistan and ongoing bombing of Iraq (violating Article 2 of the UN Charter); its treatment of the Guantánamo Bay prisoners (violating the Geneva Convention); and for its “first strike” nuclear weapons doctrine (violating the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty).
• Bush has declared his willingness to commit another grave breach of international law by bombing Iraq without authorization from the Security Council.
• The Bush Administration has also undermined the US Constitution by declaring the War Powers Act (requiring Congressional authorization to launch a war) irrelevant.
• As for “violent ambitions,” Bush’s are indeed limitless. In June 2002, he described his doctrine of “pre-emption:” “the military must be ready to strike at a moment’s notice in any dark corner of the world.” Who are the targets? “All nations that decide for aggression and terror.”
• And the US has the power to back up its threats. Its military budget dwarfs that of all other adversary countries combined; and US troops are stationed in 148 of the world’s 188 countries.
2. “By refusing to comply with his own agreements [Saddam Hussein] bears full guilt for the hunger and misery of innocent Iraqi citizens.”
• According to UNICEF and the World Health Organization, US-led sanctions against Iraq have killed over one million people, half of them children under five.
• In 1991, the US bombed the civilian infrastructure of Iraq, including bridges, roads and facilities that protected the water supply of 22 million people.
3. “…sanctions were maintained after the war to compel the regime’s compliance with Security Council Resolutions.”
• Every US administration since the Gulf War has stated that sanctions would be maintained even if Iraq cooperates with the UN: “Iraqis will be made to pay the price while Saddam Hussein’s in power. Any easing of the sanctions will be considered only when there is a new government” (Robert Gates, National Security Advisor to Bush I).
• The US position actually undermines Security Council resolutions by nullifying any incentive for Iraqi compliance.
4. “Iraq likely maintains stockpiles of VX, mustard and other chemical agents…the regime is rebuilding and expanding facilities capable of producing chemical weapons.”
• The keyword is “likely.” Credible analysts such as former chief UN weapons inspector Scott Ritter maintain that the military threat from Iraq is exaggerated. They point out that since the Gulf War, Iraq has been largely disarmed and that it lacks the delivery systems (e.g., long-range missiles and rocket launchers) to turn chemical agents into “weapons of mass destruction.”
• Iraq’s possible stores of biological agents are courtesy of the US, which supplied Baghdad with stock for anthrax, botulism, E. coli and other deadly diseases throughout the 1980s.
• If Bush is concerned about chemical and biological weapons, he should stop manufacturing and selling the agents needed to make them.
• Bush has rejected a UN draft agreement to enforce a biological weapons ban, resisted amendments to strengthen the chemical weapons convention and (like Saddam Hussein) refused to grant UN chemical weapons inspectors full access to US laboratories.
5. “[Iraq] retains physical infrastructure needed to build a nuclear weapon… And if an emboldened regime were to supply these weapons to terrorist allies, then the attacks of September 11 would be a prelude to far greater horrors.”
• Retaining the infrastructure “needed to build” a nuclear weapon is not the same thing as building it. None of Bush’s references to Iraqi nuclear capability demonstrate that Iraq possesses or plans to use nuclear weapons.
• By contrast, George Bush has ordered the Pentagon to draw up plans for dropping nuclear bombs on seven countries. The US is the world’s leading producer of nuclear weapons and the only country in the world to ever use a nuclear bomb.
• Raising the specter of Iraqi cooperation with “terrorists” is a cynical scare tactic. Attempts by US intelligence agencies to link Baghdad to al-Qaeda in the wake of 9/11 quickly proved groundless. There remains no evidence of Iraqi collusion with international terrorism.
6. “Are Security Council resolutions to be honored and enforced or cast aside without consequence?”
• Good question, George. Let’s ask key US allies, like Turkey and Israel, which have long stood in violation of multiple Security Council Resolutions and enjoy overwhelming support from the US. (The US response to Israel’s defiance of 44 Security Council resolutions is $3 billion a year in funding).
• The US itself is not in violation of Security Council resolutions because it can veto any proposed resolution that is not to its liking. In recent years, the US has vetoed more Security Council resolutions than any other country in the world.
7. “Free societies do not intimidate through cruelty and conquest.”
• The US has bombed civilians indiscriminately (Vietnam, Iraq, Serbia, Afghanistan);
• attempted to assassinate heads of government (Congo, Cuba, Libya, Iran);
• subverted democratic elections (Greece, Guatemala, Chile);
• blockaded civilian supplies of food and medicine (Cuba, Nicaragua, Iraq);
• supported policies of rape, torture and mass killing (Guatemala, Nicaragua, El Salvador);
• and backed regimes responsible for some of the world’s worst human rights violations (Indonesia, Zaire, Iran, South Korea, Israel, Philippines).
8. “Saddam Hussein attacked Iran in 1980 and Kuwait in 1990. He’s fired ballistic missiles at Iran and Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Israel. His regime once ordered the killing of every person between the ages of 15 and 70 in certain Kurdish villages in northern Iraq. He has gassed many Iranians and 40 Iraqi villages.”
• Most of Saddam Hussein’s atrocities were committed while he was a close US ally and trading partner.
• The US sold Iraq military hardware and biological and chemical weapons equipment even after learning that Iraq used illegal chemical weapons against Kurdish civilians in the Halabja massacre of 1988. US intelligence agencies believe that the massacre was carried out with US-made helicopters.
• Only in 1990, when Saddam Hussein disobeyed the US with his unauthorized invasion of Kuwait, was he converted from a key asset to a “rogue leader.”
9. “These nations can show by their example that honest government, respect for women and the great Islamic tradition of learning can triumph in the Middle East and beyond.”
• “Honest government?” Bush owes his presidency to a stolen election. Key members of his Cabinet and Bush himself are implicated in the shady dealings of corporations including Enron, Halliburton and Harken.
• “Respect for women?” Bush banned federal aid to international family planning programs that offer abortion counseling and closed the White House Office for Women’s Health Initiatives and Outreach.
• “Tradition of learning?” Bush cut federal funding to libraries by $39 million and sought to eliminate a federal program that gives free books to poor children. His proposed tax cut for the richest 1% of the population is 128 times more than what he proposed to spend on federal reading programs.
10. “By heritage and by choice, the US will make that stand. And, delegates to the United Nations, you have the power to make that stand, as well.”
• Bush’s closing remark was a prime example of what Michael Moore refers to as the president’s “bite me” foreign policy. Here, Bush bluntly informed the world that the US will pursue its war against Iraq with or without authorization from the United Nations.
11. “The conduct of the Iraqi regime is a threat to the authority of the United Nations and a threat to peace.”
• Here’s what Bush thinks of the authority of the United Nations: Since taking office, he has scrapped more international treaties and violated more UN conventions than the rest of the world has in 20 years.
• Under Bush, the US has opposed the Kyoto protocol on global warming, boycotted a conference to promote the comprehensive (nuclear) test ban treaty and ripped up the anti-ballistic missile treaty. Bush refuses to ratify the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child or sign the treaty to ban landmines. The US walked out of the 2001 UN World Conference Against Racism and virtually ignored the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development. And Bush is the only President in history to “unsign” a UN treaty – the Rome Treaty creating the International Criminal Court.
• As for being a “threat to peace,” there’s little doubt that Bush’s “war on terror,” which violates international law, the US Constitution, international human rights instruments and principles of international cooperation and collective security, is the single greatest threat to peace in the world today.
In light of the grave and gathering danger posed by the Bush Administration, we hereby call on the United Nations to declare the United States to be a “threat to peace” under Article 39 of the United Nations Charter. The Security Council, acting under Article 7 of the Charter, must countermand this threat.
In the event of a US veto of the Council’s “enforcement action,” we call on the UN General Assembly to invoke its Uniting for Peace Resolution of 1950 and assume the Security Council's mandate of enforcing international peace and security.
To quote the “president” of the United States, “Will the United Nations serve the purpose of its founding, or will it be irrelevant?”
Archives"Press Room" Home April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 July 2006 June 2006 April 2006 March 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 April 2005 March 2005 November 2004 October 2004 April 2004 March 2004 January 2004 December 2003 October 2003 September 2003 June 2003 April 2003 January 2003 September 2002 June 2002 January 2002 November 2001 October 2001 September 2001 August 2001 January 2001
Kat Noel, Website & Media Coordinator
PHONE: +1 212 627 0444
MADRE & Our Partners Make News
The Right to Heal: 11 Years After Iraq Invasion, U.S. Urged on Reparations for War's Enduring Wounds (Democracy Now!, March 26, 2014)
Protests Call Iraq's New Family Law 'Legalization of Pedophilia' (Rudaw, March 10, 2014)
Haiti: the neoliberal model imposed on the country is failing its citizens (The Guardian, February 5, 2014)
Human rights group slams Iraq over treatment of women in prison (Miami Herald, February 2, 2014)
New Ways to Evaluate Impact (Stanford Social Innovation Review, January 24, 2014)