Ending the Global Gag Rule Permanently
Posted on: Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Last week, MADRE joined hundreds of organizations from the US and around the world in calling on Representative Nita Lowey and Senator Patrick Leahy to take action to prohibit the future imposition of the dangerous Global Gag Rule on health and family planning providers working overseas.
Read the full letter (pdf) addressed to Representative Nita Lowey, Chair of the Subcommittee on State, Foreign Operations and Related Programs in the House Committee on Appropriations.
Read the full letter (pdf) addressed to Senator Patrick Leahy, Chair of the Subcommittee on Department of State, Foreign Operations and Related Programs in the Senate Committee on Appropriations.
On behalf of our organizations and our constituencies in the United States and around the world, we thank you for your commitment to achieving universal access to voluntary family planning and other reproductive health services and care. Your tireless work to ensure that American foreign policy recognizes the unique needs of women and girls and to guarantee access to desperately needed reproductive health care is key to the progress that has been achieved. We are proud to stand with you now, as we have during the past two decades in debate after debate over the basic rights of women in the poorest parts of the world.
We are writing today to ask for your continued leadership by including language in the FY 2011 State, Foreign Operations and Related Programs Appropriations bill that would protect the free speech of organizations and enhance the provision of family planning and other reproductive health services by prohibiting the imposition of the dangerous Global Gag Rule on health and family planning providers working overseas.
You are well aware about the harmful effects of the Global Gag Rule on family planning providers and, more importantly, the women who rely on these services. Now is the time to enact legislation that makes clear that no foreign health care provider can be disqualified from U.S. assistance simply because it provides a health care service with its own private funds that is legal both within its own country and here in the United States, or because it engages in political debate about abortion policy within its own country. “The Global Democracy Promotion Act”, which you just reintroduced, does just that. We encourage you to include it in the appropriations bill this year.
We were deeply gratified when President Obama lifted the policy within a week of assuming office and we are confident that his action is benefiting thousands of women. However, the political ping-pong match of the policy being in effect, then not, then again, then not again and so on, creates even more burden on providers who have to juggle and change their programs to accommodate the political winds, rather than best public health practice. In some ways, it creates an inefficient use of resources – which is misguided. Indeed, reports from the field suggest there is now reluctance on the part of some U.S.-funded organizations to work with other family planning service providers who were unable to be funded during the Bush administration as a result of the Gag Rule. This reluctance is due to uncertainty as to whether those organizations will be able to continue to participate in a project over its full five-year period or will be forced to drop off the team if the Gag Rule were to be reinstated under a new administration. The concern about partnering with these affected groups will almost certainly intensify as the next election cycle approaches.
For far too long, the health and rights of women and girls in the developing world have been treated by American policymakers as little more than a tool in a domestic political struggle. We look forward to working with you and your staff in the coming weeks and months to support this provision and to ensure its enactment into law. Thank you again for your long record of leadership on this critical issue.
Archives"Press Room" Home August 2014 July 2014 June 2014 May 2014 April 2014 March 2014 February 2014 January 2014 December 2013 November 2013 October 2013 September 2013 August 2013 July 2013 June 2013 May 2013 April 2013 March 2013 February 2013 January 2013 December 2012 November 2012 October 2012 September 2012 August 2012 July 2012 June 2012 May 2012 April 2012 March 2012 February 2012 January 2012 December 2011 November 2011 October 2011 September 2011 August 2011 July 2011 June 2011 May 2011 April 2011 March 2011 February 2011 January 2011 December 2010 November 2010 October 2010 September 2010 August 2010 July 2010 June 2010 May 2010 April 2010 March 2010 February 2010 January 2010 December 2009 November 2009 October 2009 September 2009 August 2009 July 2009 June 2009 May 2009 April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 December 2008 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 July 2006 June 2006 April 2006 March 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 April 2005 March 2005 November 2004 October 2004 April 2004 March 2004 January 2004 December 2003 October 2003 September 2003 June 2003 April 2003 January 2003 September 2002 June 2002 January 2002 November 2001 October 2001 September 2001 August 2001 January 2001
MADRE & Our Partners Make News
In Iraq, women 'are the battlefield' (Women Under Siege , August 12, 2014)
Haitian woman faces death threats for speaking out about violence against women (WBEZ Worldview, July 16, 2014)
Media Spotlight Turns Away from Iraq, as Concerns Mount Over Human Rights and Political Stalemate (Uprising Radio, July 11, 2014)
Iraq: The women left behind (Aljazeera, July 3, 2014)
Under Isis, Iraqi women again face an old nightmare: violence and repression (The Guardian, July 3, 2014)